[library Boost.StaticAssert
[copyright 2000 2005 Steve Cleary and John Maddock]
[purpose Compile time diagnostics library]
[license
Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
(See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt
)
]
[authors [Maddock, John], [Cleary, Steve]]
[category template]
[category testing]
[category generic]
[last-revision $Date$]
]
This manual is also available in
[@http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-docs/
printer friendly PDF format].
[section:intro Overview and Tutorial]
The header `` supplies two macros:
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(x)
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(x, msg)
Both generate a compile time error message if the integral-constant-expression `x`
is not true. In other words, they are the compile time equivalent of the assert macro;
this is sometimes known as a "compile-time-assertion", but will be called a
"static assertion" throughout these docs. Note that if the condition is `true`,
then the macros will generate neither code nor data - and the macros can also
be used at either namespace, class or function scope. When used in a template,
the static assertion will be evaluated at the time the template is instantiated;
this is particularly useful for validating template parameters.
If the C++0x `static_assert` feature is available, both macros will use it.
For `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(x)`, the error message will be a stringized version of `x`.
For `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(x, msg)`, the error message will be the `msg` string.
If the C++0x `static_assert` feature is not available, `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(x, msg)`
will be treated as `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(x)`.
The material that follows assumes the C++0x `static_assert` feature is not available.
One of the aims of `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT` is to generate readable error messages.
These immediately tell the user that a library is being used in a manner that
is not supported. While error messages obviously differ from compiler to compiler,
but you should see something like:
Illegal use of STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE
Which is intended to at least catch the eye!
You can use `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT` at any place where you can place a declaration,
that is at class, function or namespace scope, this is illustrated by the
following examples:
[section:namespace Use at namespace scope.]
The macro can be used at namespace scope, if there is some requirement must
always be true; generally this means some platform specific requirement.
Suppose we require that `int` be at least a 32-bit integral type, and that `wchar_t`
be an unsigned type. We can verify this at compile time as follows:
#include
#include
#include
#include
namespace my_conditions {
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(std::numeric_limits::digits >= 32);
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(WCHAR_MIN >= 0);
} // namespace my_conditions
The use of the namespace my_conditions here requires some comment.
The macro `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT` works by generating an typedef declaration,
and since the typedef must have a name, the macro generates one automatically by
mangling a stub name with the value of `__LINE__`. When `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT` is
used at either class or function scope then each use of `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT`
is guaranteed to produce a name unique to that scope (provided you only use
the macro once on each line). However when used in a header at namespace
scope, that namespace can be continued over multiple headers, each of which
may have their own static assertions, and on the "same" lines, thereby generating
duplicate declarations. In theory the compiler should silently ignore duplicate
typedef declarations, however many do not do so (and even if they do they are
entitled to emit warnings in such cases). To avoid potential problems, if you
use `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT` in a header and at namespace scope, then enclose
them in a namespace unique to that header.
[endsect]
[section:function Use at function scope]
The macro is typically used at function scope inside template functions,
when the template arguments need checking. Imagine that we have an
iterator-based algorithm that requires random access iterators.
If the algorithm is instantiated with iterators that do not meet our
requirements then an error will be generated eventually, but this may
be nested deep inside several templates, making it hard for the user to
determine what went wrong. One option is to add a static assertion at
the top level of the template, in that case if the condition is not met,
then an error will be generated in a way that makes it reasonably obvious to
the user that the template is being misused.
#include
#include
#include
template
RandomAccessIterator foo(RandomAccessIterator from,
RandomAccessIterator to)
{
// this template can only be used with
// random access iterators...
typedef typename std::iterator_traits<
RandomAccessIterator >::iterator_category cat;
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(
(boost::is_convertible<
cat,
const std::random_access_iterator_tag&>::value));
//
// detail goes here...
return from;
}
A couple of footnotes are in order here: the extra set of parenthesis around the
assert, is to prevent the comma inside the `is_convertible` template being
interpreted by the preprocessor as a macro argument separator; the target type
for `is_convertible` is a reference type, as some compilers have problems
using `is_convertible` when the conversion is via a user defined constructor
(in any case there is no guarantee that the iterator tag classes are
copy-constructible).
[endsect]
[section:class Use at class scope]
The macro is typically used inside classes that are templates.
Suppose we have a template-class that requires an unsigned integral type with
at least 16-bits of precision as a template argument, we can achieve this
using something like this:
#include
#include
template
class myclass
{
private:
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(std::numeric_limits::is_specialized, "myclass can only be specialized for types with numeric_limits support.");
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(std::numeric_limits::digits >= 16, "Template argument UnsignedInt must have at least 16 bits precision.")
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(std::numeric_limits::is_integer, "Template argument UnsignedInt must be an integer.");
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(!std::numeric_limits::is_signed, "Template argument UnsignedInt must not be signed.");
public:
/* details here */
};
[endsect]
[section:templates Use in templates]
Normally static assertions when used inside a class or function template,
will not be instantiated until the template in which it is used is instantiated.
However, there is one potential problem to watch out for: if the static assertion
is not dependent upon one or more template parameters, then the compiler is
permitted to evaluate the static assertion at the point it is first seen,
irrespective of whether the template is ever instantiated, for example:
template
struct must_not_be_instantiated
{
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(false);
};
Will produce a compiler error with some compilers (for example Intel 8.1
or gcc 3.4), regardless of whether the template is ever instantiated. A
workaround in cases like this is to force the assertion to be dependent
upon a template parameter:
template
struct must_not_be_instantiated
{
// this will be triggered if this type is instantiated
BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(T) == 0);
};
[endsect]
[endsect]
[section:how How it works]
`BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT` works as follows. There is class `STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE`
which is defined as:
namespace boost{
template struct STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE;
template <> struct STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE{};
}
The key feature is that the error message triggered by the undefined
expression `sizeof(STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE<0>)`, tends to be consistent
across a wide variety of compilers. The rest of the machinery of
`BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT` is just a way to feed the `sizeof` expression into a `typedef`.
The use of a macro here is somewhat ugly; however boost members have spent
considerable effort trying to invent a static assert that avoided macros,
all to no avail. The general conclusion was that the good of a static assert
working at namespace, function, and class scope outweighed the ugliness of a macro.
[endsect]
[section:test Test Programs]
[table Test programs provided with static_assert
[[Test Program][Expected to Compile][Description]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/example/static_assert_example_1.cpp static_assert_example_1.cpp]] [Platform dependent.] [Namespace scope test program, may compile depending upon the platform. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/example/static_assert_example_2.cpp static_assert_example_2.cpp]] [Yes] [Function scope test program. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/example/static_assert_example_3.cpp static_assert_example_3.cpp]] [Yes] [Class scope test program. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test.cpp static_assert_test.cpp]] [Yes] [Illustrates usage, and should always compile, really just tests compiler compatibility.]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test_fail_1.cpp static_assert_test_fail_1.cpp]] [No] [Illustrates failure at namespace scope. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test_fail_2.cpp static_assert_test_fail_2.cpp]] [No] [Illustrates failure at non-template function scope. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test_fail_3.cpp static_assert_test_fail_3.cpp]] [No] [Illustrates failure at non-template class scope. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test_fail_4.cpp static_assert_test_fail_4.cpp]] [No] [Illustrates failure at non-template class scope. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test_fail_5.cpp static_assert_test_fail_5.cpp]] [No] [Illustrates failure at template class scope. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test_fail_6.cpp static_assert_test_fail_6.cpp]] [No] [Illustrates failure at template class member function scope. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test_fail_7.cpp static_assert_test_fail_7.cpp]] [No] [Illustrates failure of class scope example. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test_fail_8.cpp static_assert_test_fail_8.cpp]] [No] [Illustrates failure of function scope example. ]]
[[[@../../libs/static_assert/test/static_assert_test_fail_9.cpp static_assert_test_fail_9.cpp]] [No] [Illustrates failure of function scope example (part 2). ]]
]
[endsect]